| |
The Need for Predator Control
By:
Cliff Feldheim
Valley Waterfowl
Biologist
There is no place on earth that has not in some way
been altered by man, and North American duck habitats are no exception.
In the U.S. and Canada, prairies, were once largely treeless grassy
areas that were ideal duck nesting habitats. As the Prairies became
farmed, tree rows and houses were built, and the once vast prairies were
broken into much smaller sections. Trees and man made structures have
made the prairies habitable for animals that historically never lived
there. Raccoons, skunks, and red foxes existed in very limited numbers
prior to European settlement. However the eradication of wolves and
coyotes, in combination with new denning sites, and ranching practices
have allowed these predator populations to explode.
The result for most
species of ducks that nest in the prairies has been lower nest success.
Upland nesting ducks and dabbling ducks, do not adapt well to predators
like the red fox that search grasslands looking for prey. Female ducks,
in large, try to hide in the grass to avoid predation, but become easy
pickings for a red fox. It’s generally accepted that nest success of
15-20% is necessary for a population to be stable (the number varies by
species). In the 1990’s, research suggested that nest success for
upland nesting ducks was about 10% (well below the 15-20% mark). In the
last 20 years, numerous studies have documented that nest and hen
predators are the primary cause of population decline and low production
of ducks.
In 1994, Delta
Waterfowl initiated a predator management program in the U.S. Prairies.
Professional trappers targeted red fox, raccoons, and skunks. Since
that time, study sites have ranged from 1 square mile (6,400 acres) to
36 square miles (92,160 acres). Over the last 10 years, nest success on
these managed sites has been consistently 200 to 300% higher than
unmanaged sites. In 2003, one 92,160 acre site had an 80% nest
success.
Despite Delta’s efforts
to evaluate and restore a balance to the predator community on the
Prairies, other conservation groups and many waterfowl biologists are
adamantly opposed to predator management. These conservation groups
argue that we should be spending our limited money on restoration,
conservation, and protection of habitat not predator management. While
this is good in theory, research suggests that given the current
predator community in the Prairies, predator control is a much more
viable option.
Many studies (both
published and unpublished) from the Prairies have documented that
relatively small tracts of land that are protected and conserved in the
name of waterfowl actually end up having nest success consistently below
the 15-20% mark. While these projects may be good for conserving
habitat and grassland wildlife, if they are paid for by duck hunting
dollars they should produce ducks. The Delta Waterfowl Report was
quoted by saying, “But the issue on the table is ducks, and our best
science tells us that habitat alone isn’t always enough to increase duck
production rates. Dollars provided in good faith by duck hunters are a
major source of funding for habitat projects, but in many cases hunters
aren’t getting a fair return on their investment. Many of the elaborate
and expensive habitat projects simply aren’t producing ducks. Many
actually qualify as population sinks [habitat that attracts ducks but
actually hurts the population because nest success rates are so low]”
(Delta Waterfowl Report, Spring 2003). When push comes to shove, the
only way we can preserve our tradition is by having ducks to shoot. In
California we can learn from the example in the Prairies. Compared to
the Prairies, nest success in California has been studied relatively
little. The only published study, McLandress et al. 1996, examined nest
success of mallards from 1985-1989 on Honey Lake, Ash Creek, Mendota,
Gray Lodge, and Grizzly Island Wildlife Areas and at Sacramento,
Delevan, and Colusa National Wildlife Refuges. Nest success during this
period was highly variable, averaging from 6 to 75%.
This study was
conducted on habitats managed for wildlife; however, most of the
waterfowl habitat is not managed for production. Given this, and the
fact that California’s landscape has been highly altered and fragmented,
one can assume that nest success is lower than in most of the state.
Like the Prairies, California’s predator community has been
significantly altered by human caused changes to the environment.
Similar to the Prairies, large mammalian predators are basically absent.
Red foxes, skunk, and raccoon populations are artificially high due to
native habitat destruction, lack of historic flooding, creation of
suitable habitat, and agricultural production.
In California, the
question needs to be asked, how much habitat do we need to set aside and
how should the habitat we have be managed to best produce ducks? Most
of our state and federal wildlife areas/refuges receive funding from
duck hunting. On some of these lands fields are set aside for nesting
ducks, but on others they are only managed for wintering ducks (similar
to most duck clubs). We have the potential to raise a lot of ducks in
this state and not just mallards. Cinnamon teal, gadwall, and wood ducks
would greatly benefit if managed properly. We have to wonder if small
patches of nesting habitat are hurting not helping our local duck
populations (with nest success below 15-20%). Although predator
management is politically unpalatable, it’s an insult to duck hunters
that red foxes can be trapped to increase nest success of clapper rails,
northern shrikes, and snowy plovers. Feral cats are also trapped to
benefit the survival of riparian brush rabbits and the majority of the
general public and wildlife biologists don’t object.
The more experienced
duck hunter may be content with relatively fewer opportunities to shoot
ducks. However, the only way we can recruit new hunters and waterfowl
biologists is to give them more ducks to harvest. California has great
potential to produce ducks and help perpetuate our great tradition of
hunting.
|
|













|